Wuthering Heights has stormed the global box office with one of the biggest openings of the year — but while audiences have turned out in force, critics remain sharply divided over Emerald Fennell’s bold reimagining of Emily Brontë’s 1847 novel.
The romantic drama, starring Margot Robbie as Catherine Earnshaw and Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff, debuted to an impressive US$76.8 million (£56m) worldwide on its opening weekend. Of that, US$34.8 million came from North America in its first three days, making it the year’s biggest opening so far. According to PostTrak polling, an estimated 76 per cent of ticket buyers were women — underlining the film’s strong appeal among female audiences.
Produced by Warner Bros. and MRC, the film reportedly carried a production budget of US$80 million, excluding what is believed to be a substantial global marketing spend. With its lavish period design, sweeping Yorkshire landscapes and A-list leads, the studio clearly positioned it as a prestige literary adaptation with blockbuster reach.
But from the moment the project was announced, it was never going to be a safe or traditional retelling.
Fennell — best known for Promising Young Woman and Saltburn — has built a reputation for provocative storytelling, stylised visuals and morally complex characters. Her take on Wuthering Heights leans heavily into the sensuality and psychological volatility of the central relationship, amplifying the obsessive, destructive bond between Catherine and Heathcliff rather than softening it for mainstream audiences.
@warnerbrosanz talk about costume goals #WutheringHeightsMovie ♬ original sound - warnerbrosanz
The story, as in Brontë’s novel, follows the doomed love affair between Catherine Earnshaw and the brooding orphan Heathcliff, whom her father brings to live at Wuthering Heights. Their intense connection is tested by class divisions, jealousy and revenge, with consequences that ripple across generations.
Fennell’s adaptation, however, foregrounds the erotic charge and emotional brutality of their relationship in a way some viewers have found confronting.
@wutheringheightsmovie Never stop. #WutheringHeightsMovie ♬ original sound - Wuthering Heights Movie
Supporters have praised the film’s ambition and visual flair. Several critics have lauded Robbie’s performance as feral, magnetic and emotionally unrestrained, arguing she captures Catherine’s selfishness and volatility without sanitising her. Elordi, meanwhile, has been commended for presenting a physically imposing yet wounded Heathcliff, leaning into the character’s outsider status and simmering rage.
The cinematography and production design have also drawn strong praise, with reviewers highlighting the moody, windswept landscapes and opulent interiors that contrast with the characters’ internal chaos. Some have called it the most visually arresting adaptation of the novel in decades, arguing that Fennell’s heightened style matches the operatic intensity of Brontë’s prose.
@elledecor Director Emerald Fennell, stars #MargotRobbie and #JacobElordi, and production designer Suzie Davies take us on an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the sets of the upcoming @wutheringheightsmovie, where one question guided everything: What do we want to feel? Their answer involved mapping skin onto walls, letting nature invade architecture, and creating spaces where every surface reflects something unusual. It's oppressive and seductive, brutal and beautiful—and it's in theaters this Friday. #WutheringHeights ♬ original sound - ELLE DECOR
However, detractors have been just as vocal.
Some literary purists argue that the film strays too far from the spirit of the original text, accusing it of prioritising shock value over emotional nuance. The decision to emphasise explicit sexual content has sparked debate online, with critics claiming it tips into excess and risks reducing the story’s gothic tragedy to spectacle.
@such.polina Have you ever wondered what the differences between Emily Brontë’s Wutherinf Heights novel and Emerald Fennell’s 2026 film “adaptation” are? Let me explain! #whattowatch #NewReleases #WutheringHeights #WutheringHeightsMovie #emilybronte ♬ original sound - Polina | Film & TV Girl 🍿
Others have questioned casting choices and tonal shifts, suggesting the film feels more like an Emerald Fennell auteur piece than a faithful Brontë adaptation. A recurring criticism is that the script simplifies some of the novel’s layered narrative structure — which famously uses multiple narrators — in favour of a more linear, cinematic arc.
Some viewers are expressing how unsatisfied they felt leaving the theatre, because of the major differences between the 1847 novel and Emerald Fennell's adaptation. Among many, viewers seem most concenred about important characters missing such as Hindley, Catherine's brother and Heathcliff's abuser, or even Cathy and Linton's child. Indeed, the movie seems to 'stop' at the firsrt half of the novel, leaving a lot of plotlines unresolved.
Another 'elephant in the room' is what some viewers have called the 'white-washing' of Heathcliff. Indeed, in the 1847 novel, the story relies heavily on discussions around race as Heathcliff is originally mixed race or black - the way it exposes racism was at the time of publication considered scandalous and inappripriate, which is partially why the novel was banned.
Finnally, other viewers are poiting out that 'art has no obligation to be faithful to its source material.' As much as disappointement from the novel's fans is understandable, Emeral Fennell never pretended to produce an excat replica of this story - which has been referenced in literature, film and music time and time again. Fennel herself pointed out she was merely inspired by how she felt when she first read the novel at 14 years old, basing her project on that feeling.
The conversation has played out intensely on social media, where audiences appear split. Some viewers have described it as bold, intoxicating and refreshingly unromantic in its portrayal of toxic love. Others have labelled it indulgent and accused it of “dishonouring” Brontë’s legacy.
@bbcnews Two words: Mixed bag. #WutheringHeights #MargotRobbie #JacobElordi #FilmTok #FilmReview #News #BBCNews ♬ original sound - BBC News
This pattern — commercial success paired with critical polarisation — is not unfamiliar for prestige literary adaptations, particularly those helmed by directors known for pushing boundaries. In many ways, the backlash mirrors the novel’s own controversial reception upon its publication in 1847, when critics were shocked by its dark themes and moral ambiguity.
What is undeniable is that the film has sparked conversation — and ticket sales. With a strong female turnout and significant international interest, the studio will be watching closely to see whether word-of-mouth sustains momentum in the weeks ahead.
For now, Wuthering Heights stands as both a box office triumph and a cultural lightning rod — proof that nearly two centuries after its publication, Emily Brontë’s tale of love, obsession and revenge still has the power to provoke.
