
![]()
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) confirmed it has authorised additional charges against the brothers following new evidence involving four more alleged victims. Prosecutors have also begun the process of seeking their extradition from the US to the UK.
Andrew Tate, 39, now faces seven additional rape charges, three counts of trafficking for sexual exploitation, three assault charges causing actual bodily harm, and 19 further offences linked to indecent images of children and extreme pornography. Tristan Tate, 38, has been charged with one count of sexual assault, two counts of rape, and three counts related to trafficking for sexual exploitation.
The CPS said the new allegations, together with the existing charges, involve offences said to have taken place between July 2010 and August 2017. Malcolm McHaffie, head of the CPS Special Crime Division, stated that the updated case now includes seven alleged victims. He also reminded the public that legal proceedings are active and urged people not to publish or share material that could affect the fairness of the trial.
Bedfordshire Police said investigators from its Major Crime Unit have continued working alongside the CPS and law enforcement agencies in the UK and abroad. Assistant Chief Constable Karena Thomas described the investigation as highly complex and asked the public to avoid speculation while the legal process continues. She also reaffirmed the force's commitment to tackling violence against women and girls and supporting victims.
The brothers' lawyer, Joseph McBride, rejected the allegations, describing the new charges as an attempt to undermine separate legal action the Tates have filed in the United States. He said he believes they will ultimately be cleared and criticised what he called an abuse of legal authority.
Andrew and Tristan Tate are also involved in separate legal proceedings in Romania, where they currently reside. They have consistently denied all allegations against them. Earlier this year, the High Court dismissed their attempt to challenge the CPS over its refusal to disclose the identities of the alleged victims